<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eIQcast Episode 17: Exposed Smart Metering and Energy Security Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/2009/07/06/eiqcast-episode-17-exposed-smart-metering-and-energy-security-compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/2009/07/06/eiqcast-episode-17-exposed-smart-metering-and-energy-security-compliance/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Security and Compliance Management from eIQnetworks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlinkous</title>
		<link>http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/2009/07/06/eiqcast-episode-17-exposed-smart-metering-and-energy-security-compliance/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>jlinkous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/?p=220#comment-123</guid>
		<description>The goal of compliance -- in this case, specifically NERC CIP - is to provide exactly that: a framework to reduce those vulnerabilities that could potentially bankrupt the company.  You&#039;re correct in your implication that compliance and security are separate disciplines, but compliance can still help organizations acheive security.  Compliance is (one of) the means; security is the goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The goal of compliance &#8212; in this case, specifically NERC CIP &#8211; is to provide exactly that: a framework to reduce those vulnerabilities that could potentially bankrupt the company.  You&#8217;re correct in your implication that compliance and security are separate disciplines, but compliance can still help organizations acheive security.  Compliance is (one of) the means; security is the goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/2009/07/06/eiqcast-episode-17-exposed-smart-metering-and-energy-security-compliance/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eiqnetworks.com/?p=220#comment-118</guid>
		<description>i think one needs to worry if vulnerabilities would put these firms out of business via outages and customer losses ...  not compliance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think one needs to worry if vulnerabilities would put these firms out of business via outages and customer losses &#8230;  not compliance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
